The Trap of the Easy Fight 🫨

I had a in depth strategy conversation with a client in the gym today.

They were expressing certain difficulty about sparring a specific type of opponent.

Not the golden gloves champion. Not the highly skilled technician.

They were frustrated about sparring the person with zero strategy.

Many boxers, myself included, think: "Why is it so much harder to strategically box someone who isn't employing any strategy at all?"

It sounds counterintuitive. You would think someone with less skill would be an easier puzzle to solve.

But in the ring, chaos is often harder to deal with than skill.

A skilled fighter has rhythm. They have patterns. If I throw a jab, I know the three most likely ways a skilled fighter will counter. We are speaking the same language.

The brawler doesn't speak the language. They don't have rhythm. They throw wild punches from angles that make no sense. They are unpredictable because they don't even know what they are going to do next.

The puzzle pieces just don't fit.

The temptation in this moment is overwhelming: To sink to their level.

You think, "Well, if they aren't boxing properly, I'll just go out there and brawl with them."

You abandon your jab. You stop moving your head. You start swinging wildly because you want to "beat them at their own game."

But the moment you do that, you lose your advantage. You turn a chess match into a coin flip.

So, what is the answer?Heading

In boxing, the way to beat a brawler isn't to brawl. It is to strategize the nitty-gritty.

You don't dumb down your game. You actually have to add layers to it.

Here is the paradox: You get to your distance to land a clean shot. Perfect.

But then they throw back. It's sloppy. They aren't at the right range. Their punches are flailing, effectively "wrong," which makes them incredibly hard to read. You can't slip a punch that has no structure.

So now, you have to work twice as hard.

You have to be at your distance to hit, but then you actually have to step into their distance—right into the mess—just to be able to slip properly.

You have to put yourself in the danger zone just to make your defense work.

This isn't just a boxing problem.

How often does this happen to you in life?

You run into people—at work, in relationships, on social media—who are not operating with logic. You are trying to reason with them from your distance (the safe distance of facts and calmness).

And they are throwing "sloppy punches"—shifting goalposts, getting emotional, making no sense.

If you stay at your distance, you can't "slip" their drama. It still grazes you. It still annoys you. You can't predict it.

Sometimes, to navigate the situation, you have to step into their distance.

You have to step into the emotional weeds with them—not to stay there, and not to become sloppy yourself—but because that is the only place you can effectively maneuver.

You have to get close enough to the chaos to understand the "arc" of their irrationality.

Don't just stand back and judge.
Step in.
See where they are coming from.
Slip the drama.
Then step back out to your distance.

If the puzzle piece doesn't fit, don't break your own piece to force it. Step closer, see the board from their view, and play your game from the inside out.

When have you used an effective strategy to navigate chaos? Or, what type of chaos do you need help problem-solving right now?ading

Add text to your email.